Turbo Shoes
Having
an old car is almost as expensive as having a child. I’ve never had a child,
but I’m going to assume they are expensive. Every small noise my car would make
was a sign of trouble. For one month, I had to get my car fixed twice. Almost
$2,000 later, it still didn’t work. Was I ripped off? Maybe. Did I own a piece
of junk? Definitely. Finally, I decided to buy a new car; well, at least the car
would be new to me.
First,
I needed to figure out how much I could pay monthly. I looked at my expenses to
see where I could cut down on spending. Of course my savings for college, rent, and utilities couldn't be cut down. As much as it hurt, I realized I had to
stop buying shoes. See, that would be no problem if I didn’t work with shoes. I need to believe in what I sell. It was also very unrealistic for me to just stop buying the things I love most. With this in mind, I had to compromise with myself. Per month, I would have a $600 budget, a car payment would be about $300 and a pair of shoes would be about $60. My budget constraint graph is shown below.
For my opportunity cost, I would need to give up buying 5 pairs of shoes for one car payment. Or buy 5 pairs of shoes and miss a car payment, which is very irresponsible. I do only need one car payment per month, but I would like to pay off the loan faster.
It is also quite obvious to see that purchasing a car is a better option than using an Uber or Lyft. This would be an example of positive analysis.
An example of normative analysis would be to donate $300 to charity, just like the book pointed out.
After much deliberation, I decided to purchase only one pair of shoes monthly so I could buy a BMW and have some money left for any necessities.
Comments
Post a Comment